Monday, March 11, 2019

Evaluation and Application of Thesis

MMS DBA Student-Walden University Introduction Christopher and To allow in the article, Developing foodstuff Specific Chain Strategies, authentic the thesis that there are ternion feasible communication channel designs for cater train (Christopher & Towill, 2002). These designs resulted from the analysis of the relations between, look at, product, publish lead-times, as main factors in planetary add up chain, and, make up and agility, as results from the market requirements. Christopher and Towill adoptive a notion of kernel cost that reflects more the unit cost than the traditional way of limiting cost to manufacturing cost (Christopher & Towill, 2002).Hewlett-Packard (HP) along with its early integrated process grant chain focal point has adopted that notion of core cost (Lee & Billington, 1995 Edmondson & Wheelwright, 1989). In fact primitive integrated inventories with retailers adopted by HP correspond to the fast repartee prototype developed by Christopher a nd Towill (Billington et al. , 2004). The predictable demand model whitethorn fit the decentralized incorporated system adopted by HP (Edmondson & Wheelwright, 1989). Analysis and FindingsBased on the assumptions that demand is each predictable or volatile, product is either standard or special, and affix lead-times are either long or short, and all are applicable in the global supply market, Christopher and Towill induced octonary possibilities for the supply chain based on demand, product, and supply lead-times (Christopher & Towill, 2002). The findings of eight possibilities based on the characteristics of demand, product, and lead-times specified is coherent to the numeral combination formulae associated, the number of possibilities to combine three sets of 2 elements each.The analysis of these eight possibilities, in respect with agility and cost effectiveness, led Christopher and Towill to conclude on the representativeness of the three pipelines, lean pipeline, agile pip eline, and fond response model, as supply chain models (Christopher & Towill, 2002). These models fit well the global supply chain for, an judge demand is either predictable or volatile corresponding to the two first pipelines and an unexpected demand requires a restless response, hence the quick response model fits that kind of demand.Christopher and Towill provided in that study examples and tables supporting the findings and developed a concise theoretical basis for the quick response model. The tables whitethorn have been supported with more mathematical concepts within the text. The investigate findings by Christopher and Towill in this study are intended for managers of global supply chain as a whole in order to achieve rivalrous advantage for their companies.The lean supply chain that applies the lean model to the consummate supply may be a modern view of the quick response model developed by Christopher and Towill (Mentzer, Myers, & Stank, 2007, p. 288). Applicability to HP Hewlett-Packard (HP) started to undertake the global supply cost re slowlyd problems back in late 1980s, and implemented integrated processes (Lee & Billington, 1995 Edmondson & Wheelwright, 1989). HP company leaders continued research for competitive advantage through supply chain models adopting the concept of total cost and resulted in massive cost savings (Billington et al. 2004). The adoption of the total cost of the supply chain framework mentioned shows that the quick response model as developed by Christopher and Towill is consistent to the HP Company supply model at least for pioneering in viewing the cost of a unit not only in term of manufacturing but in term of supply, building and distribution (Christopher & Towill, 2002). The electronic market is changing rapidly and HP had since 1991 implemented a decentralized and incorporated system that allowed localise divisions to operate more independently (Lee & Billington, 1995).This incorporated and decentralized sys tem adopted by HP leaders is consistent to the predictable demand pipeline developed by Christopher and Towill. Conclusion Christopher and Towill concluded, suggesting that Generally the preferred solution will be that predictable demand for standard items will be met via a lean pipeline in all likelihood fed from overseas manufacturers. Volatile demand for special items will then be met via an agile pipeline probably fed from home manufacturers.A third pipeline design is for quick response to top-up standard products for which there are an unexpected demand for particular proposition colors, sizes, and volume. References Billington, C. , Callioni, G. , Crane, B. , Ruark, J. D. , Rapp, J. U. , White, T. , & Willems, S. P. (2004, Jan/Feb). Accelerating the Profitability of Hewlett-Packards Supply Chains. Interfaces, 34(1), 59-72, from Business Source Premier, doi 10. 1287/inte. 0103. 0054 Edmondson, Harold E. , & Wheelwright, Steven C.. (1989). salient Manufacturing In The Coming De cade.California Management Review, 31(4), 70-90, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID 289046). Lee, H. L. , & Billington, C. (1995, Sep/Oct). The ontogeny of Supply-Chain-Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard. Interfaces, 25(5), 42-63. Martin Christopher, & Denis R Towill. (2002). Developing market specific supply chain strategies. International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 1-14, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID 196608131). Mentzer, J. T. , Myers, M. B. , & Stank, T. P. (Eds. ). (2007). Handbook of global supply chain management. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.