Brown V. Louisiana Essay

During the 1960s, many African-Americans look atd t palpebra civil ripes should become a national priority. progeny civil rights activists brought their cause to the national stage and demanded the federal govern workforcet advocate them and help resolve the issues that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by protesting at stores and schools that practiced segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and overbearing Court rulings that orde vehement the integration of buses and bus stations, violence and prejudice against African-Americans in the South continued Meyer, F.S. , 1968). In the 1960s many things were off limits to African-Americans. They werent revered as equals and suffered greatly because of it. Theres an unfamiliar case to most that took place in lanthanum that helped shaped the use of world facilities for all people. This case is know as Brown v. Louisiana. The Audubon Regional Library in Clinton, Louisiana, Parish of East Feliciana did non serve blacks. Blacks, at that time, were expected to use one of two bookmobiles. The red bookmobile served whites and the blue bookmobile served blacks.On March 7, 1964, ive young African-American males entered the adult learning room and one of the men, Brown, requested a book called, The Story of the Negro, by Arna Bontemps. The champion librarian checked the card catalogue and discovered that the depository library did not have the book. She told Brown that she would request it from the reconcile library and he could either have it mailed to his home address or he could pick it up from the bookmobile. After the men had been given the news slightly the book they sat down quietly.After the men failed to leave the library, the auxiliary librarian requested that they go. They did not. Brown sat down while the others stood nearby. The assistant librarian then went to the head librarian who requested them to leave as well. Again, they did not. A few moments later, the s heriff arrived and requested that they leave again, and again, they did not. The sheriff arrested them and charged them with the intention to stir a breach of peace and failure to leave a public building when ordered to do so (Coates, R. , 2005). The five men were assay and found guilty.Brown was sentenced to pay $150 for court costs or spend 90 days in Jail. The four other men were sentenced to $35 for court costs or 15 days in ail. Under Louisiana law, the convictions werent appealable on that pointfore their requests for discretionary reviews were denied. The self-governing Court granted certiorari. A certiorari is an extraordinary privilege mandate granted in cases that otherwise would not be entitled to review. In writing for the majority, Justice Fortas first examined whether the protesters could be convicted for refusing to leave the library.He reason out that they could not since their protest was peaceful and blacks could not be denied access since whites were allowed inner as well. He reviewed the onduct of the men and felt that this had no merit either. The state argued that the men were proving their intent to disturb the peace and upset the librarian. Justice Fortas reason out that the arrest was a violation of the mens First and 14th Amendment rights that guarantee freedom of speech and assembly and the right to opposed this picture and took to issue with the majoritys reasoning.He disagreed that the Constitution prohibits any state from making sit-ins or stand-ups in public libraries illegal. Second, Black argued that the previous breach of the peace cases in Louisiana differed from Brown v. Louisiana. Previously thither had been several other situations where there were peaceful displays over discriminatory practices. Garner v. Louisiana (1961) involved a sit-in at a lunch counter to protest dish out for whites only. In Taylor v. Louisiana (1962) blacks again protested the presence of bus depot that was for white customers only.In C oxv. Louisiana (1965) a man led a demonstration near the courthouse and Jail to protest the arrest of other demonstrations. Each of the protests, along with Brown v. Louisiana, was all orderly and peaceful and was over discriminatory practices that denied the protesters rights hat were guaranteed to them under the Constitution. Justice Black opposition was joined by common chord other Justices. They argued that the First Amendment did not guarantee to any person the right to use someone elses property even that owned by the government and dedicated to other purposes.On Wednesday, February 23, 1966 the decision was made 5 votes for Brown and 4 against him (Coates, R. , 2005). The young men won The Courts ruling in this case, along with the others, proved vital to the Civil Rights struggles and besides to the Vietnam War protests that would follow. Indeed, without these rulings the 1960s and early 1970s may have been a completely different period in time, especially when it comes to the Civil Rights movement. In the last line of Justice Blacks opinion in Brown v.Louisiana he wrote The holding in this case today makes it more infallible than ever that we stop and look more closely at where we argon going (Meyer, F. S. , 1968). In conclusion, had it not been for demonstrations of this kind, and the Supreme Court granting certiorari there is a strong possibility that none of this would have ever interpreted place. Oftentimes, it is in a ime of pain and suffering that the Just shall prevail, and I believe this is no different.There is more work to do but with the Supreme Court being behind you, at least you know its not in vain.