Thursday, May 30, 2019

An Ethics of Reading :: Edith Wharton Literature Feminism Essays

An Ethics of ReadingAt the age of nine, Edith Wharton fell ill with typhoid. The local doctor told her parents secret code could be done and that their daughter would soon die. Only the ministrations of another physician, who happened to be passing through town and was prevailed upon to examine the girl, saved her lifespan. Her fever fell, and the young Wharton began to witness. During her convalescence, she pick up voraciously. One of the books she was given contained a super-natural tale a story which turned out to be, in Whartons own phrase, perilous reading (Wharton, p.275). In the real manuscript of her autobiography, Edith Wharton describes how reading this uncanny story occasioned a relapse, which brought her, once again, on the point of deathThis one book brought on a serious relapse, and again my life was in danger and when I came to myself, it was to enter a world haunted by formless horrors. I had been a naturally fearless child straightaway I lived in a state of ch ronic fear. Fear of what? I cannot say and even at the time, I was never able to formulate my terror. It was corresponding some dark undefinable menace forever dogging my steps, lurking, threatening (pp.2756).1According to Wharton, an act of reading plunged her body back into fatal illness. The young Edith Wharton did recover from the relapse, but its uncanny effects continued to haunt her well into adulthood. In Women and Madness the Critical Phallacy (1975), Shoshana Felman tells another uncanny story of reading. Analyzing the critical commentary that brackets Balzacs Adieu in a Gallimard/Folio pocket edition, she demonstrates how two scholars, Pierre Gascan and Patrick Bertier, effectively rewrite Balzacs story by focusing their analyses entirely on a section of historical backstory despite the fact that this element comprises but one-third of Balzacs narrative.2 In addition, by adopting a criteria of alleged realism and labeling Stphanies madness as super-natural, they excise Balzacs main character (a madwoman) and replace her with protagonists who are soldiers in the Grand Army. The madwoman inhabits, according to these critics, a state of semi-unreality linked to the movement of the invisible which renders her inexplicable and outside the purview of discussion (qtd. in Felman, 1975, p.6). As a result, Felman argues, critical commentary meant to situate Balzac Adieu in a wider literary context ends up repeating Philippes cure in erasing from the text the disconcerting and ex-centric features of a womans madness, the critic seeks to normalize the text reservation the text a reassuring, closed retreat.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.